Marriage Lessons at Herman Cain’s Expense

2 Dec 2011 by davidlpatrick, 20 Comments »

Typically I don’t comment on “high-profile” relationships in the news. Most of the celebrity marriages I don’t take very seriously in the first place. Even though the world tried to stop when Kim Kardashian decided that 72 days was enough time to ride the peaks and valleys of marriage to determine if it was a worthy endeavor to continue, my lips remained sealed.

High-profile marriages aside, I’m rarely quick to make commentary on even the “everyman” marriage when they have issues. These situations are rarely simply black and white and I’ve developed a mistrust for people who can’t recognize those apparent shades of gray. Those people are either ignorant or dishonest. Whatever the case, a logical conversation with that person is not worth the time. There are tons of underlying issues and many times a trail of blood left on a person’s history that contributes to who they are today and how they approach life. So again I don’t offer unsolicited comments unless I can mine the whole picture first.

Enter Hermain Cain. I watched from the sidelines as the earlier allegation of sexual harrassment took place for Hermain Cain and I didn’t really flinch. It’s an unfortunate expectation that I think the general population has of politicians in general. Next came the allegation of a 13 year affair from Ginger White. She said it happened. He said it didn’t. It was his word against hers. Cain acknowledged that he knew the woman and that she was “an acquaintance” who he “thought was a friend.” He also admitted to giving her money. This blog continued to remain silent.

What prompted me to write then, is when I heard Cain say that his wife was unaware of this relationship. She was also unaware that he had given this woman money. I still won’t comment on Hermain and Gloria Cain’s marriage, but I thought there were a few lessons on marriage that I wanted to draw out for you:

Friends of the Opposite Sex: It is just not appropriate to be married and have friends of the opposite sex particularly friends that your spouse does not know about. Each time I bring this conversation up, I get much backlash about it. But having this guideline in your marriage is for your own protection. If you had friends of the opposite sex prior to your marriage, then after marriage that person needs to become friends with  your spouse. And barring some exceptions, you don’t really need to be alone with that person again.

A couple months ago, a woman at work asked me to go to lunch. I told her I didn’t go to lunch with women alone. She thought I was being ridiculous. I told her that I respected my marriage. Many people don’t agree with this. But there’s a certain level of accountability that’s necessary that keeps even the most innocent of circumstances on the “up and up”. If Herman Cain was spending time with this woman innocently, then he should have been ok with bringing someone else along. Had he done that, he would have someone to vouch for him.

Secrets: Why didn’t Herman Cain feel the need to tell his wife about a relationship that he has had for 13 years? This situation gave me the most pause. Now I’m not going to say whether his intentions were wrong, but I can certainly say it doesn’t look good. There should be ZERO secrets in your marriage (except for if you are planning surprise gift or something). ZERO.

If you are doing something that you can’t tell your spouse – chances are you probably shouldn’t be doing it. If you are doing something that you don’t think your spouse would care about and decided not to tell them… tell them just to make sure they don’t care. If you are doing something and think your spouse couldn’t handle it if you told them- go ahead and confess to it. In marriage you don’t have the right to determine what your spouse can or can not handle, you have a responsibilty to be truthful and let the outcome be what it will be. How dare you keep a secret and have your spouse living with you under the impression that false things are true. How dare you!

Financial Infidelity: Herman Cain gave this woman Ginger White financial support over the course of 13 years. How noble. But why wasn’t his wife aware of his generosity? Every dime that comes into your household when you are married, no matter who earns it, belongs to BOTH of you! You can divide it up however you like based on pre-established agreement, but there shouldn’t be any secret spending. That is called Financial Infidelity. I saw a report recently that said that 43% of people who lie about spending in marriage is because they want to avoid their spouse’s anger, lack of approval or lectures.

You don’t have to have sex to have an affair: Intercourse, outercourse, oral sex, manual stimulation or whatever other sexual activity is not necessarily required to be considered an affair. Whenever you are giving what belongs to your spouse to another person, you have begun to engage in an affair. Even flirting while married begins to take you down that road. Herman Cain may contend that it was innocent and there were no romantic feelings involved, but he should have checked to see what Ginger was feeling. If she was feeling that what he was doing aroused amorous feelings – it should have ended immediately!  Because Herman didn’t tell his wife about his friendship with this woman he is making it really hard to believe that an affair of any type what not his intention. The secret has positioned itself as a character flaw for him unfortunately.

Wrong Priorities: When these recent affair allegations came out, it bothered me that Cain continued campaigning for president rather than return home to deal with his marriage. I feel like that’s a first priority of every husband to take care and be concerned about his wife. I can understand that he may be nervous to face her right now. She is probably hurt, maybe angry and will probably have a ton of questions. But it’s not good to make her wait to get to the bottom of this situation. I don’t know if he is guilty of having an “affair”. But he is guilty of witholding information and keeping secrets from his wife. She is owed absolute compliance right now.

This blog post is not about Herman Cain. It’s about you and your marriage. If you can personally identify with any of these areas – make it right today. If you haven’t betrayed these marriage lessons - learn from the mistake of others.

What are your thoughts on this whole thing?


 

No related posts.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.assumelove.com Patty Newbold

    Well said, David!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CMC5T5FPBNMON3KHJEWS4LVYTE Wyatt

    Wonderful Site!  Congratulations on your nomination over at stupendous marriage.

  • Fran Babij

    WELL SAID!!! Thank you David, I know so many people that have close friendships with people of the opposite sex and I have tried to convince them that after marriage you just can’t maintain this….it’s just not right! I’m not trying to be a prude, but I am tying to be a wife that honors my husband and my marriage and my God. We can’t let there be any room for the enemy to get a foothold.

  • http://www.afearlessmarriage.com Lesli Doares

    Thanks for this dead on post.  Marriage is about being an Us.  Nothing should be hidden.  If you’re concerned about your partner’s reaction, that should be a huge clue for you to reconsider doing it.  If you can’t talk about it openly with your spouse, again that is a big clue about your relationship.  Being in a real marriage takes courage–the courage to be honest, the courage to honor your commitment despite others’ views, the courage to alter your behavior out of love for your spouse.

  • http://www.marriageadviceonline.net Liam Hamer

    Agree with every point you raise here almost 100%. A marriage is no place for secrets and deceit, and I always feel a couple should talk at length about what each of them wants out of the marriage, and also the boundaries within the marriage. Your point about hiding spending is an interesting one as I seem to see and hear about this a lot. You’re absolutely right that a matrimonial partnership means that both parties are equally responsible for the finances, and everything should be transparent.

    Thanks for an interesting and thought-provoking read.

  • Pipaclan

    yes. I agree with you!   I wrote  a post yesterday on wht we need to kep a date night in our marriage…to talk to each other!

  • Reid Davis

    Fantastic advice. I know of far too many emotional affairs that have begun as “innocent” friendships.

  • Stephanie Wright

    Thank you, thank you, thank you! I’ve heard SOME women say it’s inappropriate for a married man or woman to have friends of the opposite sex. I’ve heard very few men agree with that statement. There’s always the “don’t you trust me” excuse, but I always come back to this. It’s not about trusting your spouse as much as it being about not trusting another man/woman. We can’t trust ourselves so much that we let ourselves fall into the trap of giving another person of the opposite sex what we should be giving our spouse. End of story. Too many people swear by being able to be friends with whoever they want without fear of something turning romantic. It’s not about whether or not it could ever happen, it’s about MAKING SURE IT NEVER HAPPENS. I so appreciate your post on this. Oh, and I posted this on my facebook a couple days ago, and think more should see it. “Just because a woman (or man) doesn’t offer up her husband as a friend to other women doesn’t mean she’s intimidated or jealous. It’s just common sense for a wife (or husband) not to “loan out” their spouse to others.”

  • Happily Married

    I think you’re guilty of ignoring the shades of gray you warn about. 

    I couldn’t begin to function in my career field if I didn’t meet with the opposite sex. I always meet with them in a public setting to protect both of us, though. There is simply no need to tell my spouse about every meeting, every chance encounter with someone I’m working with. That’s not keeping a secret nor is it deceitful. 

    Further, friendships develop out of working relationships. I agree that I shouldn’t go spend time with friends of the opposite sex outside of professional purposes, though. Definitely not alone, for sure. 

    The reality is that in our day and age, as you progress through a career you will find yourself in MANY situations that are unavoidably, potentially questionable. 

    If someone that I needed to meet with told me we couldn’t meet because we were of the opposite sex, our working relationship is likely over. I don’t have the time to waste resources hauling someone around to meetings they don’t need to attend. That’s silly. 

    There are scores of perfectly legitimate reasons for each and every one of the scenarios for which Herman now finds himself being vilified.  

    My point in all of this is balance. Not everyone can live in the bubble you propose. Each of your points is an excellent general rule of thumb.   But I don’t hear generalities – I hear black and white, hard-line rules. 

    Where did those nuanced shades gray go?!

  • Anonymous

    The shades of gray mentioned in the article pertain to “issues” people find themselves in within their marriages – not the guidelines. Although I would argue that I provided for language in the post that allowed for wiggle room within those guidelines. However, I’ll entertain your comment because you seem passionate.

    Like the point I made in the post. I almost always get backlash about the friends of the opposite sex statement. And true to form, “the hit dog always hollers.”

    When I mentioned the friend of the opposite sex my point is that it is generally inappropriate, particularly when it’s secretive. There is simply something wrong with the fact that a person can’t be honest with their spouse about a person they call “friend.” That is deceitful, no matter how you color it. Perhaps we differ on weight given to the word friend.

    I see that you yourself admit that you have built general safe guards to make sure your work interactions are on the up and up. By meeting in public settings, etc. Good. I think you are proving my point. It disappoints me a little also that you would be dramatic and pendulum way to the other side in order to defend your corner though. You know that “every chance meeting” is not what I’m referring to. Although, even without being intentional about it, when I talk to my spouse about my day, many of those meetings and chance meetings come up in conversation.

    My spouse knows all the “characters in the story”, so to speak, at my job. And she knows this because we discuss our day with each other. I’m sure your spouse knows too. For some reason, in Herman Cain’s instance, his story included a woman who’d been a character in his story for over a decade and his wife never even knew about it. Does that still feel ok to you?

    You can’t avoid meetings at times, you are correct. But you do have control over mitigating some of the situations when you can. And when you can’t just let your spouse know that you are going out to lunch with a woman/man for business just so that she is aware. For integrity sake. If Herman Cain is innocent, I bet that he wished that he was more straight-forward with his wife now. Because even if there was nothing to the allegations, there is now a question mark lodged in his wife’s mind about why he chose to keep a secret.

    Yes, these are in fact guidelines and “rules of thumb” executed however a person think fits their marriage best. I noticed that your only problem was the friends of opposite sex though.

    But whatever… to each his own.

  • Anonymous

    I think in your short response you said it better than I could ever have said it. I think I may even steal that line about “loaning out” spouses. And thanks for posting to facebook.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks so much!

  • http://AssumeLove.com Patty Newbold

    Like Happily Married, my career pretty much requires meetings with both women and men and cultivating professional relationships with many of them. Some of those professional relationships turn into friendships.

    But I don’t see these as gray areas.

    I agree with you, David, about reducing the risk of sending the wrong message to any you meet with or befriend. Notifying your spouse about every contact depends a lot on the nature of your career and your spouse’s wishes.

    However, if you are intentionally deceiving your spouse or withholding information that might upset your spouse (like who you spend your money on or whose thigh your hand has groped today), you are out of integrity, whether you do it with the opposite sex, the same sex, or all by your lonesome. And you are still out of integrity, and damaging your marriage, whether your spouse finds out or not, whether your spouse believes your story or not, and whether you did it to get even or not.

  • Pingback: A Petty Blog » Link Clearance: Some interesting (?) stuff I found on the net

  • http://lovelinesfor2.blogspot.com/ Pastorbv

    Ms. Cain stated that her husband would have to be a “different man” for any of the allegations to be true.  By that she meant that he would have had to be someone completely different than the man she had been married to for so long. 
    She couldn’t be closer to the truth. Whether or not Mr. Cain committed adultery is a matter of conjecture.  But in all men there most definitely is a “different man.”  There is a man within each of us that our wives scarcely knows.  Any honest man could admit this.  Within each of us their is a bewildering maelstrom of erotic hungers and sexual fantasies that (in most cases) would cause our wives to refer us to pastoral counseling.  Let’s get real and face the fact that there are secret areas of our souls that we don’t dare share because of the cultures in which we have been raised. This is why seemingly noble and intelligent men commit the dumbest sexual transgressions.  And all the world wonders? Why? If we were honest, we would admit that no one (pastors included) really want to know the “different man” within each of our souls.

  • Valarie

    I totally agree with you, I would never go out with a man alone unless it was a family friend, and we were both at an event with kids. Why set your self up for trouble. Ron Paul has always had that rule, even with journalists, and he has saved himself a lot of trouble.

    There will always be good and bad in a marriage. You seem happily married, this short video is funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1xpUQVrI1g

  • Edwardpetri

    wow so intense. everyone of you have your own take about this. i like reading all your comments. seeing how people position themselves about this topic this is a nice blog.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Edward, I love when the readers are passionate about the topics! It’s makes for a much better conversation. What’s a blog without the interactions!

  • Anonymous

    Seems like Ron Paul has a good rule in my book! Thanks for sharing!

  • Pingback: ScheidungInsolvenz

Your Marriage is Important to Us!

On our Facebook page, our description reads “if 50% of marriages are ending in divorce, that means there is another

Follow Me!

Follow Me! Follow Me! Follow Me! Follow Me!
Alltop. We're kind of a big deal.

Most Popular Posts

pinkbuttonanim1

Categories

Resources We’re Reading

Thea’s Tweets

  • There's a baby in the store that's making that "ahhhh" sound from that movie "The Grudge"-the mom thinks it's cute but it's freaking me out 5 hours ago

David’s Tweets

  • Made me laugh ~> "Everything happens for a reason, but sometimes the reason is you're stupid & make bad decisions." 11 minutes ago